Playing a video (Stop)
Powered by Haskell (GHC 8.8.4 )

Svitlana Bryn'ko

I'm looking at the teaching as the rather specific proses. It attends of people people's needs, experiences, feelings,tools and so on.

Kolb' model is rather interesting, because it involves us to reflecting on the experience.

Driscoll's model also can have for existent.It also based on the learning and the experience.

Viktor Vitruk

I think that Driscoll’s "What?" model is an effective tool for reflection. It is simple and easy to use, even for those who are new to reflective practice. The model is based on three main questions: "What?", "So what?", and "Now what?". These questions help to structure thoughts and analyze a situation clearly.

 

In my opinion, this model helps people understand what happened, why it is important, and what can be done differently in the future. It encourages learning from experience and improving one’s professional or personal practice. That’s why I find this model very useful and practical.

Anhelina Andriienko

I completely agree with Schön's approach to reflection as it encompasses both action during the lesson and analysis afterwards. Reflection-in-action helps me to change the course of the lesson in real time - for example if students do not understand a topic, I can immediately explain it differently or change the task. Reflection-on-action allows me to calmly analyze what went well and what needs to be improved after the lesson, for example by referring to methodological literature. Both approaches promote flexibility, thoughtfulness and professional growth.

Marina Bohun

 

As far as this issue is hardly thought over by specialists, it's of no wonder to see rather similar models with some transformations and improvements. So, the final version, Gibb's Reflective Cycle, seems to me the most well-judged. Pointing to the emotional component attracts me the most.

Kristina Veselova

Driscoll`s model:

- quick and easy to apply after each lesson;

- helps identify specific improvements in teaching tools, students engagement and online interaction;

- it can be even used with students to reflect on their own learning

Olga Golovata

All these reflective models are rather similar. They are based on concrete experience. which is followed by reflection and action.

I would choose Shon`s reflective model as I often act this way.

ERA Cycle

The cycle shows that we will start with an experience. Once something has been experienced, we will start to reflect on what happened. This will make us to decide

on the next steps. This leads to the final element of the cycle - taking an action. This action will result in another experience

and the cycle will continue.

Svitlana Vaida

1.Study the information about the reflective models (ERA, Driscoll, Kolb, Gibbs, Schon).

2.Compare them and identify common features, pros and cons.

3.Decide which model appeals to you most of all and why.

4.Present your feedback on the board Lino. Enter Your name.

Exploring Reflective Models and Identifying

their Pros and Cons.

Task"Reflective Models"