Phonology ==> 23/10/2024

1-Sequences which actually occur in a language : black and hat

2-Sequences which could occur, but do not: grib and blig

3- Sequences which could not occur because they violate the phonglogical patterns of the language: bnar and zdla

1. Sequences which actually occur in a language. E.g. Stop, Cross. (/st-/ and /kr-/)

2. Sequences which could occur, but do not. E.g. shtop (/sht-/). The sequence is permissible but does not occur.

3. Sequences which could not occur because they violate the phonological patterns of the language. E.g. Splk (splk-) This sequence violates English phonological patterns.

Lian Suboh

1- stay, game.

2- Squerch, phlang.

3- Fsh, plfack.

Luna

1-Sequences which actually occur in a language (friend,splash)

2-Sequences that Could Occur, but Do Not (frin)

3-Sequences that Could Not Occur Because They Violate Phonological Patterns (couldnt come up with any :( )

abd alrahman

Play, say

Pirk

ŋab

Shahd

1. Sequences that actually occur in a language:

• Examples:

• “drive”

• “splash”

2. Sequences that could occur, but do not:

• Examples:

• “flig”

• “brast”

3. Sequences that could not occur because they violate the phonological patterns of the language:

• Examples:

• “/bgrink/“

• “/ptaork/”

Rahaf

1. Fly/cry/ try

2. Frim

3. Blimpter

Alma

We can thus recognize three possibilities:

1. Sequences which actually occur in a language (for example, still,

bring, etc.).

2. Sequences which could occur, but do not (for example, stin,jleg in

English).

3. Sequences which could not occur because they violate the

phonological patterns of the language (for example, /btaii)t, pfaofJ/

in English).

Zawawi

Study the three possibilities outlined on page 50 and come up with your own examples for each one of them.

Zawawi