Playing a video (Stop)
Powered by Haskell (GHC 8.8.4 )

It may appear rigid

clear structure, less room for lack of understanding between facilitators.

Not clear on roles can lead to confusion when something goes wrong.

Higher level of comfort

Helps to have someone jump in to assist.

Perhaps a better flow and experience for the clients

If facilitators don't know each other well or work intuitively then it can be stressful and add tension

when haven' t worked with the co facilitator before can be hard to establish

Sharing resources

 

Mirroring discussion the group

Easier to support one another

Model good collaboration

More natural communication within the group

Getting stuck

more natural and flowing and fun

Can be free-flowing and natural. More spontaneous

One facilitator can focus on content

The other facilitator can focus on technical stuff.

when 1 facilitator dominates

One person can look after the main session content

The other facilitator can manage incidents or assistance of clients.

Getting stuck

Not modelling group collaboration

MAY SEEM REHEARSED

Clear responsibility of tasks.

equal input and takes pressure off of it being all on one practitioner

Can be too organic/free flowing.

This is something that can be worked towards. When it works it is great.

Model 1--Is one person will take one section--then hand it over the other person. This is often where we start.

Model 2 - Shared Co-Facilitation - Challenges

Model 1- Single Co-Facilitation - Benefits

Model 1 - Single Co-Facilitation- Challenges

Model 2 - Shared Co-Facilitation-Benefits

Zoom play session