g3 i2

petroleum-powered cars and motorcycles

Compare with two other transportation methods

Compared to cars, motorcycles are faster and more economical in the city, but less safe and comfortable.

Compared to bicycles, motorcycles are faster and more convenient for long distances, but emit more polluting gases and require more fuel.

Compared to bicycles or public transport, cars have a greater environmental impact and generate more traffic.

Compared to motorcycles, cars are safer and more comfortable, but less agile and efficient in terms of time and consumption on short trips or in congested areas.

Good points

Negative Points:

Cost: Cars are expensive in terms of maintenance, fuel and parking.

Pollution: They generate a higher amount of CO₂ emissions compared to other modes, which contributes to climate change.

Traffic and parking difficulty: In urban areas with heavy traffic, cars often have difficulty maneuvering and finding parking.

Comparison with other methods:

Positive Points:

Comfort and Space: Cars offer greater comfort and space to carry more passengers or cargo compared to motorcycles.

Weather protection: They provide better protection in rainy, hot or cold conditions.

Safety: Cars tend to be safer in case of accidents due to their structure and features such as airbags and seat belts.

Long distances: They are ideal for long journeys, as they provide comfort for the driver and passengers.

-Higher risk of accidents and serious injuries compared to cars.

-Exposure to inclement weather (rain, cold, heat).

-Cargo space: Limitations for transporting objects and passengers.

-Less comfort on long trips compared to a car.

-Requires regular maintenance and can be expensive.

LOPE MOLINA, ERICK EDSON

MURGA VILLAJUAN, ARIANNE

Bad points