Playing a video (Stop)
Powered by Haskell (GHC 8.8.4 )

because every company is specified to something like production, photography, etc. And in the end, all of these companies go back to Disney

There's no problem with letting one company own that much of companies at the same time they can own and invest as much as they want in different fields, at the end, it will help the economy grow more.

Everything has pros and cons , it’s doesn’t matter how I think, it’s all about policy

Yes and No.

 

Big corporation creates a lot of work places and gives good salary and benefits. Also they have money for innovations and development

 

When company is huge it is not easy to control all parts of the business, so I think the quality in some parts may suffer

I don't see it as a "should", they just reached to agreements and I believe they were agreed from both sides

Yes I believe they’re right because they’re the creative people make the organization and after they must receive all money for all related with the original idea. I believe it’s fair if someone want to produce something must pay for it. This is call author’s right.

There can be. Investment cooperation should not limit the number of companies.

As we just recently learned, Disney owns over 200 companies. While this is (most likely) legal, do you think one company should have this much control? Why/why not?

6/9/22 #1