Playing a video (Stop)
Powered by Haskell (GHC 8.8.4 )

Fokardi 11-A

 

If I could travel bake in time, I would go to the end of Victorian era. This era lasted from 1837 to 1901. I would like to visit this era for several reasons. Firstly this era is considered to be the time of the highnest prosperity of the British state, the rise of economic development and well-being of society, the flourishing of culture and arts. The phase,,Victorian era’’ has entered British and world culture as a permanent nickname. I consider this era one of the most unique in English history, and not going there will be a huge loss.

  And secondly in this era I would like to meet Charles Darvin. He was an English scientist who developed the theory of evolution and proposed the princips of natural selection.

This man delighted me from an early age of my childhood, because he was the one who turned the whole world of biology at that time and , in general the view of mankind in the world.

Nazariy Ship

 

1) I don't think it's important, I would even say that animal experiments greatly accelerate the development of various drugs that in the future can greatly help people. Cosmetics, of course, are not the main medicine, but we live in a capitalist world and as long as people buy cosmetics, companies will test it on animals, because this method is the cheapest and thus cosmetic companies can make a better financial report. that will attract more investors.

 

2) I don't think the government can't change anything as long as it's profitable for them. Without animal testing, many cosmetics companies will lose profits, some may go bankrupt and not pay taxes, so the government will resist anything that hurts the economy anyway.

If these experiments are banned, say, in Belgium, then this will reduce competition in the market and another company will open, say, in China, where everyone everyone won't care about these experiments and the company will occupy this niche in the market.

Bitter truth.

 

3) Humans throughout our history have hunted wild animals, I think it's in our blood.

4) In areas where it is permitted, hunting can help regulate the numbers of certain animal species. But poaching must be strictly suppressed. In general, instead of fighting hunting in certified zones, it would be better to fight poaching in third world countries, where, in fact, various rare animals are genocide, the number of which is rapidly declining 11

1. I firmly believe that need to stop the practice of testing cosmetics on animals. I think the main reason is that animals are also living beings that should not be in laboratories.They feel pain and their overwhelming natural instincts are to stay alive and be free.Every animal must be free. No one has the right to take away their freedom.

2. I would write them a question. Would you like to live in a laboratory where you are tested on cosmetics? I suppose you could say "no". Therefore, I would ask them to ban animal testing of cosmetics and close all laboratories.

3. I think I would like to emphasize that hunting animals for sports is still popular, because people like to show off that they are stronger than someone and have some power over some living thing. Taking someone's life is much easier than giving. For hunters it is a pleasure, for them it is entertainment, and for animals - no.

4. I am convinced that the hunt for animals must be stopped immediately. For the sake of some joy, killing an animal is cruel. It is better to have a legal hunt for some kind of animal. This is monitored by the state and the species will not disappear due to hunting.

11

 

Dasha Alexandra

1) I think testing cosmetics on animals is very cruel and scary in today's world. Animals are living beings just like us and they should not suffer side effects in laboratories. They should be free like all of us.

 

2) If I had the opportunity to write to them, I would address them as ordinary people who value their freedom and have the right to everything within the limits of the law. I think that if they were in the place of animals in laboratories, then they definitely would not be happy about this. I would ask them to find alternative ways to test cosmetics and not abuse animals.

 

3) It seems to me that those people who are engaged in sport hunting do not understand all the danger and wildness of this hobby. Perhaps they even feel stronger than someone or show their skills and consider this a good achievement.

 

4) I am definitely convinced that animal hunting should be stopped in any case. People should stop this cruelty and show humanity to their smaller brothers.

11

 

Vasileva Sofia

Roma Karpov

 

1. I think the main reason is that people like to compete with each other. I suppose you could say that those who hunt for sport are surely trying to catch better game than others to show that they are better in hunting.

2. One obvious problem with hunting for sport is that the best species are being killed, which leads to extinction of certain kind of animals.

11

1.I believe that practice of testing cosmetics on animals is terrible and it’s absolutely vital to stop doing that, because it harms animals and destroys ecological balance on our planet.

2.Regrettably a lot of companies still test cosmetics on animals, but I think it’s not that hard to find more appropriate alternatives for testing products. For example tests in vitro(on false human’s skin)

3.I think the main reason is that not all people are socially conscious enough, to realize that this kind of entertainment is as violent as gladiator fights.

4.It is obvious that hunting animals for sport kills thousands of animals, just for somebody’s joy, so people have to stop doing that immediately, because it’s just not humanly.

Ivanka Burok

11

Answer the questions (choose A or B) and express your point of view. Use functional phrases from the Speaking Focus box

Discussing ethical issues.docx
Download (12KB)

B

A

I can express my opinion in a discussion on social issues and use functional phrases and adverbials

Discussing ethical issues