Japan
• What were the most interesting similarities you found between legislation in your chosen country and New Zealand?
Currently in Japan, it is possible to be accredited as a registered VN (RVN) but this is not necessary in order to practice as a VN (similarly to NZ). In terms of legislation, both the Japanese Act on Welfare and Management of Animals (1973) and The Animal Welfare Act (1999) recognise animals as living beings who have the ability to feel pain. However, farm animals and aquatic life such as fish are not recognised in the Japanese Animal Welfare Act (1999).
• What were the most interesting differences you found between legislation in your chosen country and New Zealand?
Japan has a ‘D’ rating on the Animal Protection Index, whereas New Zealand has an ‘A’ which is obviously much higher.
The Japanese Act on Welfare and Management of Animals (1973) incorporates an article stating that ‘Be Kind to Animals Week’ must occur every year, between September 20-26.
• Were you able to find clear answers/guidelines on the topics that you chose to research?
There was a clear language barrier as I attempted to research various aspects of Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care in Japan.
• What would the differences in legislation and/or ease of learning about legislation mean in terms of the way you would approach working as a VN in your chosen country?
Because of the clear language barrier, anyone considering working in Japan as a VN would need to seriously consider becoming fluent in Japanese, not only in order to become familiar with relevant legislation, but to effectively and efficiently work with other staff and clients in a Japanese Veterinary clinic setting. An awareness for various religious and cultural differences would also need to be taken into account.